ArticleBMJ open2024
The Understanding America Study (UAS).
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- Monetary savings and neuropsychological functioning in older adults without dementia.Neuropsychology · 2026Article
- Health Care Professionals' Perceptions of AI in Clinical Practice: Productivity, Enjoyment, and Pay.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Public Attitudes About Preventive Dementia Vaccine Among US Adults.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Strain and recovery activities over a week predict short-term changes in processing speed measured in everyday environments: A survey response-time study in workers from a large internet panel.Neuropsychology · 2026Article
- Tracking Longitudinal Changes in Awareness, Usage, and Trust in Autonomous Vehicles: Evidence from Large-Scale, Nationally Representative U.S. Surveys (2023-2025).Transport policy · 2026Article
- Article
- Tracking quality of life-related outcomes in the U.S. population with monthly PROMIS computerized adaptive testing.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Distress signal: Self-storage facilities as sentinel spaces for community stress and mental health.Wellbeing, space and society · 2026Article
- An online population-representative longitudinal cognitive dataset from the Understanding America Study.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Examination of Total Hours of Volunteering or Informal Helping Among Older Adults and Risk of Future Functional Disability Using Data From a Large Panel Study.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association · 2026Article
- Article
- Willingness of Older Adults to Travel for Medical Care.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Gaps in large language model awareness, usage, and perceptions in the United States: Evidence from a nationally representative longitudinal survey.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- Functional and cognitive correlates of typing speed in a large U.S. panel study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prevalence and predictors of artificial intelligence chatbots use for caregiving: Evidence from the Understanding America Study.PloS one · 2026Article
- How personality traits shape susceptibility to mental distress in times of crisis: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic.PloS one · 2026Article
- Recruitment of a probability-based general population health panel for public health research in Germany: the panel 'Health in Germany'.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Background and Methodology of the 2024 annual survey from the panel 'Health in Germany' by the Robert Koch Institute.Journal of health monitoring · 2025Article
- Older Age Is Associated with Fewer Depression and Anxiety Symptoms Following Extreme Weather Adversity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Local cost of living, financial literacy, and housing hardship at older ages.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe Understanding America Study (UAS) is a probability-based Internet panel housed at the Center for Economic and Social Research at the University of Southern California (USC). The UAS serves as a social and health sciences infrastructure for collecting data on the daily lives of US families and individuals. The collected information includes survey data, DNA from saliva samples, information from wearables, contextual and administrative linkages, ecological momentary assessments, self-recorded narratives and electronic records of financial transactions. The information collected focuses on a defining challenge of our time-identifying factors explaining racial, ethnic, geographic and socioeconomic disparities over the life course, including racial discrimination, inequalities in access to education and healthcare, differences in physical, economic and social environments, and, more generally, the various opportunities and obstacles one encounters over the life course. The UAS infrastructure aims to optimise engagement with the wider research community both in data dissemination and in soliciting input on content and methods. To encourage input from the research community, we have reserved 100 000 min of survey time per year for outside researchers, who can propose to add survey questions four times a year.
participantsThe UAS currently comprises about 15 000 US residents (including a 3500-person California oversample) recruited by Address-Based Sampling and provided with Internet-enabled tablets if needed. Surveys are conducted in English and Spanish. FINDINGS TO DATE: Since the founding of the UAS in 2014, we have conducted more than 600 surveys, including a sequence of surveys collecting biennial information on health and retirement (the complete Health and Retirement Study instrument), 11 cognitive assessments, personality, knowledge and use of information on Social Security programme rules, work disability and subjective well-being. Several hundreds of papers have been published based on the collected data in the UAS. Studies include documentations of the mental health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and how this varied across socioeconomic groups; comparisons of physical activity measured with accelerometers and by self-reports showing the dramatic biases in the latter; extensive studies have shown the power of using paradata in gauging cognitive change over time; several messaging experiments have shown the effectiveness of information provision on the quality of decision-making affecting well-being at older ages. FUTURE PLANS: The UAS national sample is planned to grow to 20 000 respondents by 2025, with subsamples of about 2500 African American, 2000 Asian and 3000 Hispanic participants and an oversample of rural areas. An increasing amount of non-interview data (contextual information, data from a suite of wearables and administrative linkages) is continually being added to the data files.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.