ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2024
Deep learning-based segmentation of abdominal aortic aneurysms and intraluminal thrombus in 3D ultrasound images.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Robotic Ultrasound System for Automated Abdominal Aorta Screening: Feasibility Study in Healthy Volunteers.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultrasound (US)-based patient-specific rupture risk analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) has shown promising results. Input for these models is the patient-specific geometry of the AAA. However, segmentation of the intraluminal thrombus (ILT) remains challenging in US images due to the low ILT-blood contrast. This study aims to improve AAA and ILT segmentation in time-resolved three-dimensional (3D + t) US images using a deep learning approach. In this study a "no new net" (nnU-Net) model was trained on 3D + t US data using either US-based or (co-registered) computed tomography (CT)-based annotations. The optimal training strategy for this low-contrast data was determined for a limited dataset. The merit of augmentation was investigated, as well as the inclusion of low-contrast areas. Segmentation results were validated with CT-based geometries as the ground truth. The model trained on CT-based masks showed the best performance in terms of DICE index, Hausdorff distance, and diameter differences, covering a larger part of the AAA. With a higher accuracy and less manual input the model outperforms conventional methods, with a mean Hausdorff distance of 4.4 mm for the vessel and 7.8 mm for the lumen. However, visibility of the lumen-ILT interface remains the limiting factor, necessitating improvements in image acquisition to ensure broader patient inclusion and enable rupture risk assessment of AAAs in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39448511What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.