Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39448629›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Multiple imputation integrated to machine learning: predicting post-stroke recovery of ambulation after intensive inpatient rehabilitation.

Alice Finocchi, Silvia Campagnini, Andrea Mannini, Stefano Doronzio, Marco Baccini, Bahia Hakiki, Donata Bardi, Antonello Grippo, Claudio Macchi, Jorge Navarro Solano and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Artificial intelligence in rehabilitation: a living systematic mapping review - first release.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alice FinocchiIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi onlus, Firenze, Italy.
Silvia CampagniniIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi onlus, Firenze, Italy. scampagnin@ricres.org.
Andrea ManniniIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi onlus, Firenze, Italy.
Stefano DoronzioIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi onlus, Firenze, Italy.
Marco BacciniIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi onlus, Firenze, Italy.
Bahia HakikiIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi onlus, Firenze, Italy.
Donata BardiIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi onlus, Firenze, Italy.
Antonello GrippoIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi onlus, Firenze, Italy.
Claudio MacchiIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi onlus, Firenze, Italy.
Jorge Navarro SolanoIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi onlus, Milano, Italy.
Michela Baccini *Department of Statistics, Computer Science, Applications, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy.
Francesca Cecchi *IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi onlus, Firenze, Italy.

Funding

Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca PNC0000007Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca Ricerca Corrente
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Good data quality is vital for personalising plans in rehabilitation. Machine learning (ML) improves prognostics but integrating it with Multiple Imputation (MImp) for dealing missingness is an unexplored field. This work aims to provide post-stroke ambulation prognosis, integrating MImp with ML, and identify the prognostic influential factors. Stroke survivors in intensive rehabilitation were enrolled. Data on demographics, events, clinical, physiotherapy, and psycho-social assessment were collected. An independent ambulation at discharge, using the Functional Ambulation Category scale, was the outcome. After handling missingness using MImp, ML models were optimised, cross-validated, and tested. Interpretability techniques analysed predictor contributions. Pre-MImp, the dataset included 54.1% women, 79.2% ischaemic patients, median age 80.0 (interquartile range: 15.0). Post-MImp, 368 non-ambulatory patients on 10 imputed datasets were used for training, 80 for testing. The random forest (the validation best-performing algorithm) obtained 75.5% aggregated balanced accuracy on the test set. The main predictors included modified Barthel index, Fugl-Meyer assessment/motricity index, short physical performance battery, age, Charlson comorbidity index/cumulative illness rating scale, and trunk control test. This is among the first studies applying ML, together with MImp, to predict ambulation recovery in post-stroke rehabilitation. This pipeline reliably exploits the potential of incomplete datasets for healthcare prognosis, identifying relevant predictors.

Indexed as

Machine LearningRecovery of FunctionStroke RehabilitationWalkingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisStrokeAmbulationMachine learningMultiple imputationPredictionRehabilitationStroke

Identifiers

PMID39448629
PMCPMC11502899

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.