Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39449361›Full record

ArticleEpigenomes2024

Examining the Utility of the Mammalian Methylation Array for Pan-Mammalian Analysis of Monozygotic Twinning.

Jenny van Dongen, Charles E Breeze, Twinning Genetics Consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenomes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jenny van DongenDepartment of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2063-8741
Charles E BreezeUCL Cancer Institute, University College London, 72 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Twinning Genetics Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesHuman identical twins are born at a rate of 3-4 per 1000 live births. Many other mammals also occasionally produce monozygotic twins, referred to as sporadic polyembryony. The underlying mechanisms are unknown. Through epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS), we identified a robust DNA methylation signature in somatic tissues from human monozygotic (MZ) twins, comprising 834 differentially methylated positions (MZ-DMPs). The results point to a connection between monozygotic twinning and early genome programming and enable new angles to study monozygotic twinning.

methodsThe mammalian methylation array (MMA) measures 38,608 CpGs focusing on regions that are well-conserved across many mammalian species, allowing for pan-mammalian comparative epigenomic studies. Here, we successfully map human MZ-DMPs to probes of the mammalian methylation array across 157 mammalian genomes.

resultsAs expected, based on the modest probe overlap between Illumina 450k/EPIC and mammalian methylation array probes, only a subset of MZ-DMPs reside in conserved regions covered by the mammalian methylation array. These include probes mapping to

conclusionsIn conclusion, the mammalian methylation array may prove to be a promising platform to study whether a shared DNA methylation signature of sporadic polyembryony exists across diverse mammalian species. This may potentially point to shared underlying mechanisms.

Indexed as

clonal speciescomparative epigenomicsepigeneticsgeneticsidentical twins

Identifiers

PMID39449361
PMCPMC11503326

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.