ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
Machine-learning based risk prediction of in-hospital outcomes following STEMI: the STEMI-ML score.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review focusing on how medical researchers report variables in risk scores or models to predict prognosis of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Predicting Mortality After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in a Multiethnic Southeast Asian Population: Insights From Machine Learning.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Article
- Left Ventricular Thrombus in Ischemic Heart Failure: Machine-learning-based Prediction of Six-month Persistence and One-year Outcomes.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparing Machine Learning Models for Predicting Mortality after Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Machine learning-based risk prediction of outcomes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in Australia: the AUS-COVID Score.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Early Left Ventricular Function After STEMI.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Prediction of clinical outcomes of ST-elevated myocardial infarction patients using atmospheric solids analysis probe mass spectrometry and machine learning.The Analyst · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Approach on Predictive Model Establishment for In-Hospital Mortality in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Solutions for Databases With Dimensionality Reduction and Class Imbalance.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Traditional prognostic models for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have limitations in statistical methods and usability. Objective: We aimed to develop a machine-learning (ML) based risk score to predict in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40% (LVEF < 40%) in STEMI patients. Methods: We reviewed 1,863 consecutive STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) or rescue PCI. Eight supervised ML methods [LASSO, ridge, elastic net (EN), decision tree, support vector machine, random forest, AdaBoost and gradient boosting] were trained and validated. A feature selection method was used to establish more informative and nonredundant variables, which were then considered in groups of 5/10/15/20/25/30(all). Final models were chosen to optimise area under the curve (AUC) score while ensuring interpretability. Results: Overall, 128 (6.9%) patients died in hospital, with 292 (15.7%) patients requiring ICU admission and 373 (20.0%) patients with LVEF < 40%. The best-performing model with 5 included variables, EN, achieved an AUC of 0.79 for in-hospital mortality, 0.78 for ICU admission, and 0.74 for LVEF < 40%. The included variables were age, pre-hospital cardiac arrest, robust collateral recruitment (Rentrop grade 2 or 3), family history of coronary disease, initial systolic blood pressure, initial heart rate, hypercholesterolemia, culprit vessel, smoking status and TIMI flow pre-PCI. We developed a user-friendly web application for real-world use, yielding risk scores as a percentage. Conclusions: The STEMI-ML score effectively predicts in-hospital outcomes in STEMI patients and may assist with risk stratification and individualising patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.