Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39450234›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024

Machine-learning based risk prediction of in-hospital outcomes following STEMI: the STEMI-ML score.

Hari P Sritharan, Harrison Nguyen, Jonathan Ciofani, Ravinay Bhindi, Usaid K Allahwala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hari P SritharanDepartment of Cardiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Harrison NguyenDepartment of Cardiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jonathan CiofaniDepartment of Cardiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ravinay BhindiDepartment of Cardiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Usaid K AllahwalaDepartment of Cardiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Traditional prognostic models for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have limitations in statistical methods and usability. Objective: We aimed to develop a machine-learning (ML) based risk score to predict in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40% (LVEF < 40%) in STEMI patients. Methods: We reviewed 1,863 consecutive STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) or rescue PCI. Eight supervised ML methods [LASSO, ridge, elastic net (EN), decision tree, support vector machine, random forest, AdaBoost and gradient boosting] were trained and validated. A feature selection method was used to establish more informative and nonredundant variables, which were then considered in groups of 5/10/15/20/25/30(all). Final models were chosen to optimise area under the curve (AUC) score while ensuring interpretability. Results: Overall, 128 (6.9%) patients died in hospital, with 292 (15.7%) patients requiring ICU admission and 373 (20.0%) patients with LVEF < 40%. The best-performing model with 5 included variables, EN, achieved an AUC of 0.79 for in-hospital mortality, 0.78 for ICU admission, and 0.74 for LVEF < 40%. The included variables were age, pre-hospital cardiac arrest, robust collateral recruitment (Rentrop grade 2 or 3), family history of coronary disease, initial systolic blood pressure, initial heart rate, hypercholesterolemia, culprit vessel, smoking status and TIMI flow pre-PCI. We developed a user-friendly web application for real-world use, yielding risk scores as a percentage. Conclusions: The STEMI-ML score effectively predicts in-hospital outcomes in STEMI patients and may assist with risk stratification and individualising patient management.

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromemachine-learningmyocardial infarctionrisk scoreST-elevation myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID39450234
PMCPMC11499125

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.