ArticleShock (Augusta, Ga.)2025
HOUSING TEMPERATURE ALTERS BURN-INDUCED HYPERMETABOLISM IN MICE.
Article in Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractMice used in biomedical research are typically housed at ambient temperatures (22°C-24°C) below thermoneutrality (26°C-31°C). This chronic cold stress triggers a hypermetabolic response that may limit the utility of mice in modeling hypermetabolism in response to burns. To evaluate the effect of housing temperature on burn-induced hypermetabolism, mice were randomly assigned to receive sham, small, or large scald burns. Mice recovered for 21 days in metabolic phenotyping cages at 24°C or 30°C. Regardless of sex or sham/burn treatment, mice housed at 24°C had greater total energy expenditure ( P < 0.001), which was largely attributable to greater basal energy expenditure when compared to mice housed at 30°C ( P < 0.001). Thermoneutral housing (30°C) altered adipose tissue mass in a sex-dependent manner. Compared to sham and small burn groups, large burns resulted in greater water vapor loss, regardless of housing temperature ( P < 0.01). Compared to sham, large burns resulted in greater basal energy expenditure and total energy expenditure in mice housed at 24°C; however, this hypermetabolic response to large burns was blunted in female mice housed at 30°C, and absent in male mice housed at 30°C. Locomotion was significantly reduced in mice with large burns compared to sham and small burn groups, irrespective of sex or housing temperature ( P < 0.05). Housing at 30°C revealed sexual dimorphism in terms of the impact of burns on body mass and composition, where males with large burns displayed marked cachexia, whereas females did not. Collectively, this study demonstrates a sex-dependent role for housing temperature in influencing energetics and body composition in a rodent model of burn trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.