ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Characterization of Amnion-Derived Membrane for Clinical Wound Applications.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Two Methods for Decellularizing Human Amniotic Membranes for Use in Tissue Engineering.Methods and protocols · 2026Article
- Successful use of human amniotic allograft membrane in the treatment of recalcitrant driveline infections.JHLT open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human amniotic membrane (hAM), the innermost placental layer, has unique properties that allow for a multitude of clinical applications. It is a common misconception that birth-derived tissue products, such as dual-layered dehydrated amnion-amnion graft (dHAAM), are similar regardless of the manufacturing steps. A commercial dHAAM product, Axolotl Biologix DualGraft™, was assessed for biological and mechanical characteristics. Testing of dHAAM included antimicrobial, cellular biocompatibility, proteomics analysis, suture strength, and tensile, shear, and compressive modulus testing. Results demonstrated that the membrane can be a scaffold for fibroblast growth (cellular biocompatibility), containing an average total of 7678 unique proteins, 82,296 peptides, and 96,808 peptide ion variants that may be antimicrobial. Suture strength results showed an average pull force of 0.2 N per dHAAM sample (equating to a pull strength of 8.5 MPa). Tensile modulus data revealed variation, with wet samples showing 5× lower stiffness than dry samples. The compressive modulus and shear modulus displayed differences between donors (lots). This study emphasizes the need for standardized processing protocols to ensure consistency across dHAAM products and future research to explore comparative analysis with other amniotic membrane products. These findings provide baseline data supporting the potential of amniotic membranes in clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.