ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
XAI-Augmented Voting Ensemble Models for Heart Disease Prediction: A SHAP and LIME-Based Approach.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and interpretability of a machine learning model for postoperative hypothermia prediction in placenta previa Cesarean section: A retrospective cohort study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: An Up-to-Date Narrative Review on the Emerging Role of Lipid Profile-Based Models.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Differentiating multilocular hepatic cysts from mucinous cystic neoplasms: characteristic imaging signs and a machine learning diagnostic framework.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Electrical risk score and electrocardiographic markers in acute cholecystitis: a prospective cross-sectional study using explainable machine learning.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- A hybrid physics-informed neural and explainable AI approach for scalable and interpretable AQI predictions.MethodsX · 2025Article
- RiskPath: Explainable deep learning for multistep biomedical prediction in longitudinal data.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Explainable Boosting Machines Identify Key Metabolomic Biomarkers in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Automatic Feature Selection for Imbalanced Echocardiogram Data Using Event-Based Self-Similarity.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Explainable AI for Chronic Kidney Disease Prediction in Medical IoT: Integrating GANs and Few-Shot Learning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Secure Hybrid Deep Learning for MRI-Based Brain Tumor Detection in Smart Medical IoT Systems.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ensemble Learning (EL) has been used for almost ten years to classify heart diseases, but it is still difficult to grasp how the "black boxes", or non-interpretable models, behave inside. Predicting heart disease is crucial to healthcare, since it allows for prompt diagnosis and treatment of the patient's true state. Nonetheless, it is still difficult to forecast illness with any degree of accuracy. In this study, we have suggested a framework for the prediction of heart disease based on Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)-based hybrid Ensemble Learning (EL) models, such as LightBoost and XGBoost algorithms. The main goals are to build predictive models and apply SHAP (SHapley Additive expPlanations) and LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations) analysis to improve the interpretability of the models. We carefully construct our systems and test different hybrid ensemble learning algorithms to determine which model is best for heart disease prediction (HDP). The approach promotes interpretability and transparency when examining these widespread health issues. By combining hybrid Ensemble learning models with XAI, the important factors and risk signals that underpin the co-occurrence of heart disease are made visible. The accuracy, precision, and recall of such models were used to evaluate their efficacy. This study highlights how crucial it is for healthcare models to be transparent and recommends the inclusion of XAI to improve interpretability and medical decisionmaking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.