Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39451409›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Advances in Medical Image Segmentation: A Comprehensive Review of Traditional, Deep Learning and Hybrid Approaches.

Yan Xu, Rixiang Quan, Weiting Xu, Yi Huang, Xiaolong Chen, Fengyuan Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Contrast-Enhanced CT of the Coelom in a Female Bald Eagle (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Quality Assurance Strategies for Brain State Characterization by MEMRI.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yan XuSchool of Electrical, Electronic and Mechanical Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1QU, UK.ORCID 0009-0007-8187-0276
Rixiang QuanSchool of Electrical, Electronic and Mechanical Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1QU, UK.ORCID 0009-0003-1794-7241
Weiting XuSchool of Electrical, Electronic and Mechanical Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1QU, UK.
Yi HuangBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1UD, UK.
Xiaolong ChenDepartment of Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.
Fengyuan LiuSchool of Electrical, Electronic and Mechanical Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1QU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7915-5341

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical image segmentation plays a critical role in accurate diagnosis and treatment planning, enabling precise analysis across a wide range of clinical tasks. This review begins by offering a comprehensive overview of traditional segmentation techniques, including thresholding, edge-based methods, region-based approaches, clustering, and graph-based segmentation. While these methods are computationally efficient and interpretable, they often face significant challenges when applied to complex, noisy, or variable medical images. The central focus of this review is the transformative impact of deep learning on medical image segmentation. We delve into prominent deep learning architectures such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Fully Convolutional Networks (FCNs), U-Net, Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), Adversarial Networks (GANs), and Autoencoders (AEs). Each architecture is analyzed in terms of its structural foundation and specific application to medical image segmentation, illustrating how these models have enhanced segmentation accuracy across various clinical contexts. Finally, the review examines the integration of deep learning with traditional segmentation methods, addressing the limitations of both approaches. These hybrid strategies offer improved segmentation performance, particularly in challenging scenarios involving weak edges, noise, or inconsistent intensities. By synthesizing recent advancements, this review provides a detailed resource for researchers and practitioners, offering valuable insights into the current landscape and future directions of medical image segmentation.

Indexed as

biomedical engineeringdeep learningdiagnostic imagingimage segmentationmedical image processingmedical imaging

Identifiers

PMID39451409
PMCPMC11505408

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.