ArticleBiology2024
Enhancing Sex Estimation Accuracy with Cranial Angle Measurements and Machine Learning.
Article in Biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of current sexing methods largely depends on the use of adequate sources of data and adjustable classification techniques. Most sex estimation methods have been based on linear measurements, while the angles have been largely ignored, potentially leading to the loss of valuable information for sex discrimination. This study aims to evaluate the usefulness of cranial angles for sex estimation and to differentiate the most dimorphic ones by training machine learning algorithms. Computed tomography images of 154 males and 180 females were used to derive data of 36 cranial angles. The classification models were created by support vector machines, naïve Bayes, logistic regression, and the rule-induction algorithm CN2. A series of cranial angle subsets was arranged by an attribute selection scheme. The algorithms achieved the highest accuracy on subsets of cranial angles, most of which correspond to well-known features for sex discrimination. Angles characterizing the lower forehead and upper midface were included in the best-performing models of all algorithms. The accuracy results showed the considerable classification potential of the cranial angles. The study demonstrates the value of the cranial angles as sex indicators and the possibility to enhance the sex estimation accuracy by using them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.