ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2024
Integrating single cell and bulk RNA sequencing data identifies RBM17 as a novel response biomarker for immunotherapy in bladder cancer.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-cell insights into cisplatin resistance mechanisms in bladder cancer tumor microenvironment.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026Article
- Identification of biomarkers associated with M1 macrophages in the ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction through bioinformatics and machine learning approaches.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have been widely applied in the treatment of patients with bladder cancer (BLCA). However, there is still unmet need to dissect response predict biomarkers. To uncover CPI response-related marker genes in cancer cells, we utilized SCISSOR, integrating single-cell RNA and bulk RNA sequencing data. Transcriptomic and clinical data from IMvigor210, UNC-108, and BCAN/HCRN datasets were collected to evaluate and validate the identified biomarkers and signatures. Additionally, we analyzed TCGA-BLCA and local-BLCA RNA-seq data to investigate alternative splicing events (ASEs). Cell viability was assessed in T24 and UMUC3 cells with RBM17 upregulation or downregulation. Through SCISSOR analysis, we discovered that the expression levels of RBM17, TAP1, and PSMB8 were significantly associated with CPI response. Since PSMB8 displayed a highly positive correlation with TAP1, we developed a CPI response score (CRS) signature based on the expression profiles of RBM17 and TAP1. The CRS demonstrated robust predictive capacity in IMvigor210, UNC-108, and BCAN/HCRN datasets and was associated with higher tumor mutational burden (TMB), PD-L1 expression, and unique genomic features. Notably, RBM17 was not linked to the clinical outcomes of BLCA patients but positively correlated with BLCA cell proliferation in vitro. In the meantime, RBM17 was correlated with higher activity in core biological pathways, including antigen processing machinery, CD8 + T effector cells, cell cycle, DNA damage repair, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, histone regulation, and immune checkpoints. Moreover, the high-RBM17 group showed enrichment of LumU/Ba/sq subtypes but fewer FGFR3 alterations. Lastly, RBM17 significantly upregulated ASEs in BLCA samples, leading to higher neoantigen levels, a more inflamed tumor microenvironment, and improved CPI response. RBM17 is associated with higher ASEs and neoantigen levels, thereby potentiating the efficacy of CPI in BLCA. The established predictive signature, utilizing only two genes, has the potential to streamline clinical applications, providing a cost-effective alternative to expensive genomic, transcriptomic, and biological feature tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39453457What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.