ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2025
ShapeMed-Knee: A Dataset and Neural Shape Model Benchmark for Modeling 3D Femurs.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex-Specific Adolescent Development of the Trochlea and Distal Femoral Physis: A 3D Shape Modeling Study.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- SwMrNet: A Multi-Target Tissue Segmentation Method for Robust and Accurate Clinical Knee Diagnosis Assistance.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Measures of resting cartilage structure and composition in runners with and without knee osteoarthritis.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2026Article
- BMI and Varus Malalignment Compound to Define a High-Risk Phenotype for Compartment-Specific Knee Osteoarthritis Progression.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Analyzing anatomic shapes of tissues and organs is pivotal for accurate disease diagnostics and clinical decision-making. One prominent disease that depends on anatomic shape analysis is osteoarthritis, which affects 30 million Americans. To advance osteoarthritis diagnostics and prognostics, we introduce ShapeMed-Knee, a 3D shape dataset with 9,376 high-resolution, medical-imaging-based 3D shapes of both femur bone and cartilage. Besides data, ShapeMed-Knee includes two benchmarks for assessing reconstruction accuracy and five clinical prediction tasks that assess the utility of learned shape representations. Leveraging ShapeMed-Knee, we develop and evaluate a novel hybrid explicit-implicit neural shape model which achieves up to 40% better reconstruction accuracy than a statistical shape model and two implicit neural shape models. Our hybrid models achieve state-of-the-art performance for preserving cartilage biomarkers (root mean squared error ≤ 0.05 vs. ≤ 0.07, 0.10, and 0.14). Our models are also the first to successfully predict localized structural features of osteoarthritis, outperforming shape models and convolutional neural networks applied to raw magnetic resonance images and segmentations (e.g., osteophyte size and localization 63% accuracy vs. 49-61%). The ShapeMed-Knee dataset provides medical evaluations to reconstruct multiple anatomic surfaces and embed meaningful disease-specific information. ShapeMed-Knee reduces barriers to applying 3D modeling in medicine, and our benchmarks highlight that advancements in 3D modeling can enhance the diagnosis and risk stratification for complex diseases. The dataset, code, and benchmarks are freely accessible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.