ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis2025
Assay for the quantification of abemaciclib, its metabolites, and olaparib in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An isotope-dilution bioanalytical assay for abemaciclib and its metabolites in combination with olaparib was developed and validated in human plasma K2 EDTA. For the quantitative assay, human plasma samples (or human plasma QC samples) were spiked with internal standard solution before a simple protein precipitation with methanol. The extract was injected onto a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) instrument where it was chromatographically separated by a polar end-capped reversed phase column and guard using gradient elution with water and methanol both modified with 0.2 % formic acid (v/v) as the mobile phases. The analytes and internal standards were measured by heated electrospray ionization (HESI) in positive polarity using selected reaction monitoring (SRM) on a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. The assay was validated for linear ranges as follows: 0.4 - 1000 nM abemaciclib, 0.35 - 1000 nM M2 and M18, 0.5 - 1000 nM M20, and 0.75 - 1000 nM olaparib. The inter-day or between day precision for the quality controls (n = 18) was < 13 % and the accuracy was ± 12 %, for all analytes, including the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ). The intra-day or within day precision for the quality controls (n = 6) was ≤ 11 % and the accuracy was ± 12 % for low, mid, and high and < 19 % at LLOQ. The recovery in human plasma was determined to be between 92 % and 102 % for all analytes spanning the linear range. The validated, bioanalytical quantitative assay was designed to measure abemaciclib, its metabolites, and olaparib for pharmacokinetic evaluation of patients in clinical trials for breast, brain, and ovarian cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.