ArticleScientific reports2024
The prominent pervasive oncogenic role and tissue specific permissiveness of RAS gene mutations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pooled single-cell screen in colorectal cancer defines transcriptional modules linked to oncogenes.Molecular systems biology · 2026Article
- Structure of SHOC2-KRAS-PP1C complex reveals RAS isoform-specific determinants and insights into targeting complex assembly by RAS inhibitors.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In cancer research, RAS biology has been focused on only a handful of tumor types. While RAS genes have long been suspected as common contributors to a wide spectrum of cancer types, robust evidence is required to firmly establish their critical oncogenic significance. We present a data mining study using DepMap genome-wide CRISPR screening data, which provide substantial evidence to support the prominent pervasive oncogenic role and tissue-specific permissiveness of RAS gene mutations. Differential analysis of CRISPR effect scores identifies K- or N-RAS genes as the most differential gene in contrasts of (K-, N-, combined) RAS mutant versus wild-type cell lines across multiple tissue types. The distinguished tissue-specific pattern of KRAS vs. NRAS as top differential genes in subsets of tissue types and evidence from genome data supported the idea of KRAS- and NRAS-engaged tissue types. To our knowledge, this is the first report of prominent pervasive oncogenic role of RAS mutations revealed by gene dependency data that is beyond the current understanding of the oncogenic role of RAS genes and their well-known involved tissue types. Our findings strongly support RAS mutations as primary oncogenic drivers beyond traditionally recognized cancer types and offer insights into their tissue-specific permissiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.