Evidence mapPaperPMID 39457516Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2024

Chronic Kidney Disease Progression-A Challenge.

Silvio Maringhini, Carmine Zoccali

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Journal of inflammation research · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Silvio MaringhiniIstituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione (ISMETT), 90127 Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3946-178X
Carmine ZoccaliRenal Research Institute, New York, NY 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6616-1996

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a progressive condition characterized by a continuous decline in renal function, independent of the initial cause of damage or external factors such as infection, inflammation, or toxins. The accurate measurement of renal function, typically assessed using the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), is crucial for managing CKD. The most accepted hypothesis for CKD progression is glomerular damage caused by hyperfiltration. Various factors can accelerate CKD progression, and several biomarkers have been identified to monitor this progression. Numerous studies have explored the risk factors associated with CKD progression, and some of these factors can be modified. Additionally, several drugs are now available that can reduce CKD progression. This review summarizes recent publications and highlights potential future research directions in CKD progression. It discusses the evolution of GFR measurement methods, the mechanisms driving CKD progression, and the latest findings on biomarkers and risk factors. Furthermore, it explores therapeutic strategies, including dietary modifications and pharmacological interventions, to slow CKD progression. Understanding these mechanisms and interventions is crucial for developing effective therapeutic strategies to prevent or slow CKD progression.

Indexed as

cardiovascular complicationschronic kidney disease (CKD)CKD progressionend-stage kidney disease (ESKD)

Identifiers

PMID39457516
PMCPMC11505431

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.