ArticleNutrients2024
Optimization of Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Patients.
Article in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Brazilian consensus- and evidence-based recommendations in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency in patients after digestive surgeries. Position paper of six brazilian medical societies of surgery.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Nutritional Status and Chemotherapy Completion in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Narrative Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThis study explores the optimization of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) management in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients, focusing on the scientific advancements and technological interventions available to improve patient outcomes, including oral pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) and immobilized lipase cartridge (RELiZORB
methodsPatients were contacted at pre-defined intervals (prior to surgery, before hospital discharge, and 2, 4, 6, and 12 weeks after surgery) to complete nutrition evaluation, EPI assessment, and quality of life questionnaires to identify the severity and frequency of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms.
resultsEPI symptoms were reported in 28 of the 35 total patients studied (80%). Jejunostomy tubes were placed during oncologic surgery in 25 of the 35 total patients studied (71%), and 12 of the 25 patients with a jejunostomy tube utilized enzyme cartridges to manage EPI symptoms while on supplemental tube feeding (48%). EPI symptoms were reported in 8 of the 10 patients without a feeding tube (80%), and their EPI symptoms were managed with PERT alone. EPI interventions, both oral PERT and immobilized cartridges, were associated with a decrease in EPI symptoms after surgery and improved quality of life (QOL).
conclusionsOverall, early optimization of EPI is crucial to enhance overall patient care, return to oncology therapy after surgery, and improve quality of life in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.