ArticlePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Assessing the Neurodevelopmental Impact of Fluoxetine, Citalopram, and Paroxetine on Neural Stem Cell-Derived Neurons.
Article in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stressed, Stained, and Stored: The Impact of Maternal Distress and Smoking on Amniotic Biomarkers-A Scoping Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Transcriptomic characterization of maturing neurons from human neural stem cells across developmental time points.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesMany pregnant women globally suffer from depression and are routinely prescribed selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). These drugs function by blocking the re-uptake of serotonin by the serotonin transporter (SERT) into neurons, resulting in its accumulation in the presynaptic cleft. Despite a large amount of research suggesting a potential link to neurodevelopmental disorders in children whose mothers took these drugs during pregnancy, their possible adverse effects are still debated, and results are contradictory. On the other hand, there is an immediate need for improved cell-based models for developmental neurotoxicity studies (DNT) to minimize the use of animals in research.
methodsIn this study, we aimed to assess the effects of clinically relevant concentrations of paroxetine (PAR), fluoxetine (FLX), and citalopram (CIT)-on maturing neurons derived from human neural stem cells using multiple endpoints.
resultsAlthough none of the tested concentrations of FLX, CIT, or PAR significantly affected cell viability, FLX (10 µM) exhibited the highest reduction in viability compared to the other drugs. Regarding neurite outgrowth, CIT did not have a significant effect. However, FLX (10 µM) significantly reduced both mean neurite outgrowth and mean processes, PAR significantly reduced mean processes, and showed a trend of dysregulation of multiple genes associated with neuronal development at therapeutic-relevant serum concentrations.
conclusionsTranscriptomic data and uptake experiments found no SERT activity in the system, suggesting that the adverse effects of FLX and PAR are independent of SERT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.