ReviewDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2025
Integrated multiomic analyses: An approach to improve understanding of diabetic kidney disease.
Review in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diverse combination of factors associated with the development of diabetic kidney disease among data-driven diabetes subtypes: analysis of the J-DREAMS registry.Diabetologia · 2026Article
- Advances in the Identification of Novel Urinary Biomarkers for Diabetic Kidney Disease.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Review
- Integrative multi-omics profiling for early diagnosis, stratification and personalized management of chronic kidney disease: a new paradigm.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Review
- Exploring the Proteomic Signature of Diabetic Nephropathy: Implications for Early Diagnosis and Treatment.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Integrated multiomic analyses: An approach to improve understanding of diabetic kidney disease.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimDiabetes is increasing in prevalence worldwide, with a 20% rise in prevalence predicted between 2021 and 2030, bringing an increased burden of complications, such as diabetic kidney disease (DKD). DKD is a leading cause of end-stage kidney disease, with significant impacts on patients, families and healthcare providers. DKD often goes undetected until later stages, due to asymptomatic disease, non-standard presentation or progression, and sub-optimal screening tools and/or provision. Deeper insights are needed to improve DKD diagnosis, facilitating the identification of higher-risk patients. Improved tools to stratify patients based on disease prognosis would facilitate the optimisation of resources and the individualisation of care. This review aimed to identify how multiomic approaches provide an opportunity to understand the complex underlying biology of DKD.
methodsThis review explores how multiomic analyses of DKD are improving our understanding of DKD pathology, and aiding in the identification of novel biomarkers to detect disease earlier or predict trajectories.
resultsEffective multiomic data integration allows novel interactions to be uncovered and empathises the need for harmonised studies and the incorporation of additional data types, such as co-morbidity, environmental and demographic data to understand DKD complexity. This will facilitate a better understanding of kidney health inequalities, such as social-, ethnicity- and sex-related differences in DKD risk, onset and progression.
conclusionMultiomics provides opportunities to uncover how lifetime exposures become molecularly embodied to impact kidney health. Such insights would advance DKD diagnosis and treatment, inform preventative strategies and reduce the global impact of this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.