ArticleBMC geriatrics2024
Drug-gene interactions in older patients with coronary artery disease.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dispensing of actionable pharmacogenetic drugs among adults receiving cardiovascular disease medications in the Northern Netherlands: A serial cross-sectional study.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Pharmacogenomics in the prediction of adverse effects of cardiovascular drugs: the PGx-CardioDrug project.Croatian medical journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOlder patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) are particularly vulnerable to the efficacy and adverse drug reactions, and may therefore particularly benefit from personalized medication. Drug-gene interactions (DGIs) occur when an individual's genotype affects the pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics of a victim drug.
objectivesThis study aimed to investigate the impact of cardiovascular-related DGIs on the clinical efficacy and safety outcomes in older patients with CAD.
methodsHospitalized older patients (≥ 65 years old) with CAD were consecutively recruited from August 2018 to May 2022. Eligible patients were genotyped for the actionable pharmacogenetic variants of CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A5, and SLCO1B1, which had clinical annotations or implementation guidelines for cardiovascular drugs. Allele frequencies and DGIs were determined in the cohort for the 5 actionable PGx genes and the prescribed cardiovascular drugs. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. The influence of DGIs on the cardiovascular drug-related efficacy outcomes (all-cause mortality and/or major cardiovascular events, MACEs) and drug response phenotypes of "drug-stop" and "dose-decrease" were evaluated.
resultsA total of 1,017 eligible older patients with CAD were included, among whom 63.2% were male, with an average age of 80.8 years old, and 87.6% were administrated with polypharmacy (≥ 5 medications). After genotyping, we found that 96.0% of the older patients with CAD patients had at least one allele of the 5 pharmacogenes associated with a therapeutic change, indicating a need for a therapeutic change in a mean of 1.32 drugs of the 19 cardiovascular-related drugs. We also identified that 79.5% of the patients had at least one DGI (range 0-6). The median follow-up interval was 39 months. Independent of age, negative association could be found between the number of DGIs and all-cause mortality (adjusted HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73-0.96, P = 0.008), and MACEs (adjusted HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.72-0.98, P = 0.023), but positive association could be found between the number of DGIs and drug response phenotypes (adjusted OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.05-1.45, P = 0.011) in the elderly patients with CAD.
conclusionsThe association between cardiovascular DGIs and the clinical outcomes emphasized the necessity for the integration of genetic and clinical data to enhance the optimization of cardiovascular polypharmacy in older patients with CAD. The causal relationship between DGIs and the clinical outcomes should be established in the large scale prospectively designed cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.