ReviewCureus2024
Enhancing the Understanding of Breast Vascularity Through Insights From Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intraoperative NIR-II fluorescence guidance for precise tumor margin assessment and maximized tissue preservation in breast surgery.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- Diagnostic performance of multimodal ultrasonography for molecular subtyping of breast cancer: a retrospective study.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor/Angiopoietin-2 Bispecific Antibody-Induced Vascular Normalization: From Basic Mechanisms to Therapeutic Applications in Breast Cancer.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast vascularity plays a crucial role in both physiological and pathological processes, particularly in the development and progression of breast cancer. Understanding vascular changes within breast tissue is essential for accurate diagnosis, treatment planning, and monitoring therapeutic response. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) has emerged as a valuable tool for evaluating breast vascularity due to its ability to provide detailed functional and morphological insights. DCE-MRI utilizes contrast agents to highlight blood flow and vessel permeability, making it especially useful in differentiating between benign and malignant lesions. This review explores the significance of DCE-MRI in breast vascularity assessment, highlighting its principles, clinical applications, and role in detecting malignancy through vascular changes. We also examine its utility in monitoring treatment response and quantitative analysis of perfusion metrics such as Ktrans and extracellular-extravascular volume (Ve). While DCE-MRI offers remarkable diagnostic accuracy, challenges remain regarding its cost, accessibility, and potential overlap of enhancement patterns between benign and malignant conditions. The review further discusses emerging technologies and future directions for DCE-MRI, including advanced imaging techniques and machine learning-based quantification. Overall, DCE-MRI stands out as a powerful tool in the comprehensive evaluation of breast vascularity, with significant potential to improve patient outcomes in breast cancer management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.