ReviewCureus2024
A Comprehensive Review of Biomarkers for Chronic Kidney Disease in Older Individuals: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Salt and chronic kidney disease.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026Review
- Nomograms with arterial spin labeling for diagnosing early-stage chronic kidney disease.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- The AMPK/NRF2/FOXO Axis in CKD-Molecular and Clinical Perspectives.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Factors Associated With Physiological Dysregulation Among US Adults Aged 45 Years and Older: A Nationally Representative Study.Journal of aging research · 2026Article
- New and Emerging Biomarkers in Chronic Kidney Disease.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Emerging Biomarkers and Advanced Diagnostics in Chronic Kidney Disease: Early Detection Through Multi-Omics and AI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: What's New Regarding Its Diagnostics and Therapeutics?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a progressive condition characterized by a gradual loss of kidney function, leading to significant health complications and an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Early detection and effective management are crucial for slowing disease progression and improving patient outcomes. Biomarkers are valuable tools in CKD diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Traditional biomarkers, such as serum creatinine and urine protein, are widely used, but emerging biomarkers like cystatin C, kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) offer enhanced diagnostic precision and insights into disease severity. These advanced biomarkers are particularly important in older adults, who may present with age-related physiological changes and comorbid conditions that complicate CKD management. This review explores the current state of biomarker research in CKD, focusing on their application in older populations. It highlights the role of traditional and emerging biomarkers, discusses their relevance for early detection and prognosis, and examines future directions in biomarker research, including technological innovations and personalized medicine approaches. By integrating biomarkers into clinical practice, healthcare providers can achieve more accurate diagnoses, tailor treatments to individual patient needs, and potentially improve the overall management of CKD. Continued research and development in this field are essential for addressing the complexities of CKD and advancing patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.