ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024
Research Hotspots of Acupuncture Treatment for Myopia Over the Past Decade: A Bibliometric Analysis (2014-2023).
Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the research hotspots in acupuncture treatment for myopia from 2014 to 2023. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in the Science Citation Index-Expanded (SCI-E) within the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC). We used CiteSpace 6.2.R6 to perform an in-depth analysis of the annual publication trends, prolific authors, institutions, keyword co-occurrences, and citation bursts. The study followed the PICO framework: the population (P) includes studies on patients with myopia, the intervention (I) is acupuncture treatment, no direct comparison (C) is applied, and the primary outcome (O) focuses on the identification of research trends and hotspots. Major outcome assessments included the analysis of publication trends over time, author productivity, influential journals, and the detection of emerging research topics through citation burst analysis. This bibliometric analysis was conducted on November 15, 2023. Results: A total of 281 articles were included in the analysis. The trend line of annual publications over the past decade showed a modest increase, with a significant decline in 2019 and a surge in 2021. China and its affiliated academic institutions led globally in publication volume, with Ma Xiaopeng being the most prolific author and Fudan University the most influential institution. Conclusion: Acupuncture shows promise as a complementary and alternative therapy for treating myopia, with growing interest in its clinical efficacy and mechanisms of action. Future research is likely to focus on optimizing treatment protocols and understanding the underlying biological mechanisms of acupuncture in myopia management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.