SynthesisFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2024
Recommendations for long-term follow-up care of secondary health conditions in spinal cord injury/disorder: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Multidimensional Effects of Telemedicine on Patients With Spinal Cord Injury: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- The impact of aging on locomotor recovery in preclinical models of traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Rehospitalization Burden Profiles After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Data-Driven Latent Class Analysis of the SCIMS Public-Use Database.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this systematic review is to provide an overview of published follow-up care programs of primary and secondary health conditions (SHCs) in spinal cord injury/disorder (SCI/D) and spina bifida and describe recommendations on content, frequency, setting of follow-up care programs for persons with SCI/D and spina bifida. Methods: According to the sequence of procedures of the AWMF (Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany) a systematic literature search was performed (in PubMed, Cochrane Library and nine additional databases for guidelines) between 5 September 2019 and 22 September 2019. Publications (Jan. 2008-Dec. 2018) and guidelines (up to 2018) published in English or German and describing an evidence-based follow-up care program for persons with SCI/D or spina bifida were included. Results: The systematic literature search found 1973 publications in PubMed and Cochrane Library, resulting in 19 papers for SCI/D and 6 for Spina bifida. Additionally, we included 34 guidelines developed by reputable committees or medical associations. All eligible guidelines, and publications, were rated and classified according to the guidance of AWMF. Of the retrieved publications, and guidelines, level of evidence of follow-up care programs was mostly based on informal procedures and expert opinion or formally consent based expert opinion. None of the guidelines, or publications described an evidence based comprehensive clinical practice guideline (CPG) for follow-up care for people with SCI/D or spina bifida. Conclusion: Based on the comprehensive and extensive literature research conducted, regular (annual) follow-up care appointments at specialized SCI clinics are recommended. There is a notable absence of a comprehensive CPG covering all relevant health conditions for long-term follow-up in SCI/D or spina bifida. In order to provide persons with SCI/D with up-to-date and best possible medical and rehabilitative care, a CPG for follow-up care is urgently needed. In response to this gap, the German-speaking Medical Society of Paraplegia (DMGP) has commissioned its members to establish a guideline for follow-up care for individuals with SCI/D. The current review serves as an evidence-based framework for the development of this guideline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.