ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Statistically principled feature selection for single cell transcriptomics.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The high dimensionality of data in single cell transcriptomics (scRNAseq) requires investigators to choose subsets of genes (feature selection) for downstream analysis (e.g., unsupervised cell clustering). The evaluation of different approaches to feature selection is hampered by the fact that, as we show here, the performance of feature selection methods varies greatly with the task being performed. For routine cell type identification, even randomly chosen features can perform well, but for cell type differences that are subtle, both number of features and selection strategy can matter strongly. Here we present a simple feature selection method grounded in an analytical model that, without resorting to arbitrary thresholds or user-defined parameters, allows for interpretable delineation of both how many and which features to choose, facilitating identification of biologically meaningful rare cell types. We compare this method to default methods in scanpy and Seurat, as well as SCTransform, showing how greater accuracy can often be achieved with surprisingly few, well-chosen features.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.