ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2024
Synthetic CT generation based on multi-sequence MR using CycleGAN for head and neck MRI-only planning.
Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- How bone mis-segmentation affects MRI-based sCT dosimetry in head and neck radiotherapy: A CT-referenced study.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- A universal medical imaging modality translation model in brain and head-and-neck radiotherapy.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of different magnetic resonance (MR) sequences on the accuracy of generating computed tomography (sCT) images for nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on CycleGAN. In this study, 143 patients' head and neck MR sequence (T1, T2, T1C, and T1DIXONC) and CT imaging data were acquired. The generator and discriminator of CycleGAN are improved to achieve the purpose of balance confrontation, and a cyclic consistent structure control domain is proposed in terms of loss function. Four different single-sequence MR images and one multi-sequence MR image were used to evaluate the accuracy of sCT. During the model testing phase, five testing scenarios were employed to further assess the mean absolute error, peak signal-to-noise ratio, structural similarity index, and root mean square error between the actual CT images and the sCT images generated by different models. T1 sequence-based sCT achieved better results in single-sequence MR-based sCT. Multi-sequence MR-based sCT achieved better results with T1 sequence-based sCT in terms of evaluation metrics. For metrological evaluation, the global gamma passage rate of sCT based on sequence MR was greater than 95% at 3%/3 mm, except for sCT based on T2 sequence MR. We developed a CycleGAN method to synthesize CT using different MR sequences, this method shows encouraging potential for dosimetric evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.