ReviewBiomedical engineering letters2024
Recent advances in shape memory scaffolds and regenerative outcomes.
Review in Biomedical engineering letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Smart biomaterials for cardiovascular, bone, and skin tissue engineering: mechanisms, applications, and future prospects.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advent of tissue engineering (TE) technologies has revolutionized human medicine over the last few decades. Despite splendid advances in the fabricating and development of different substrates for regenerative purposes, non-responsive static composites have been used to heal injured tissues. After being transplanted into the target sites, grafts will lose their original features, leading to a reduction in regenerative potential. Along with these statements, the use of shape memory polymers (SMPs), smart substrates with unique physicochemical properties, has been extended in different disciplines of regenerative medicine in recent years. These substrates are intelligent and they can easily change physicogeometry features such as stiffness, strain size, shape, etc. in response to external stimuli. It has been proposed that SMPs can easily acquire their original properties after deformation, even in the presence or absence of certain stimuli. It has been indicated that the application of distinct synthesis protocols is required to fabricate dynamically switchable surfaces with prominent cell-to-substrate interaction, resulting in better regulation of cell function, dynamic growth, and reparative mechanisms. Here, we aimed to scrutinize the prominent regenerative properties of SMPs in the TE and regenerative medicine fields. Whether and how SMPs can orchestrate certain cell behavior, with reconfigurable features and adaptability were discussed in detail.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.