Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39466334›Full record

ReviewInsights into imaging2024

The prognostic value of radiogenomics using CT in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review.

Yixiao Jiang, Chuan Gao, Yilin Shao, Xinjing Lou, Meiqi Hua, Jiangnan Lin, Linyu Wu, Chen Gao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insights into imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yixiao Jiang *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China.
Chuan Gao *Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China.
Yilin ShaoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China.
Xinjing LouDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China.
Meiqi HuaDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China.
Jiangnan LinDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China.
Linyu WuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China. wulinyu@zcmu.edu.cn.
Chen GaoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China. doctor_gaochen@zcmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9372-8014

Funding

Medical and Health Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province Grant No.2022KY230Medical and Health Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province Grant No.2024KY129National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No.82102128"Pioneer" and "Leading Goose" R&D Program of Zhejiang Grant No.2022C03046Research Project of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Grant No.2022FSYYZY08Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No.LTGY23H180001Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No.LTGY24H180006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of combining radiomic and genomic models in predicting the long-term prognosis of patients with lung cancer and to contribute to the further exploration of radiomics. This study retrieved comprehensive literature from multiple databases, including radiomics and genomics, to study the prognosis of lung cancer. The model construction consisted of the radiomic and genomic methods. A comprehensive bias assessment was conducted, including risk assessment and model performance indicators. Ten studies between 2016 and 2023 were analyzed. Studies were mostly retrospective. Patient cohorts varied in size and characteristics, with the number of patients ranging from 79 to 315. The construction of the model involves various radiomic and genotic datasets, and most models show promising prediction performance with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.64 to 0.94 and the concordance index (C-index) values from 0.28 to 0.80. The combination model typically outperforms the single method model, indicating higher prediction accuracy and the highest AUC was 0.99. Combining radiomics and genomics in the prognostic model of lung cancer may improve the predictive performance. However, further research on standardized data and larger cohorts is needed to validate and integrate these findings into clinical practice. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The combination of radiomics and genomics in the prognostic model of lung cancer improved prediction accuracy in most included studies. KEY POINTS: The combination of radiomics and genomics can improve model performance in most studies. The results of establishing prognosis models by different methods are discussed. The combination of radiomics and genomics may be helpful to provide better treatment for patients.

Indexed as

GenomicsLung cancerPrognosisRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID39466334
PMCPMC11519241

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.