Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39467147›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2024

Developing Individualized Follow-Up Strategies Based on High-Risk Recurrence Factors and Dynamic Risk Assessment for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Jianjian Qiu, Yilin Yu, Zhiping Wang, Liang Hong, Lingdong Shao, Junxin Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jianjian QiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8201-6967
Yilin YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8771-7762
Zhiping WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Liang HongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Lingdong ShaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Junxin WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1047-2338

Funding

Fujian Clinical Research Center for Radiation and Therapy of Digestive, Respiratory and Genitourinary Malignancies 2021Y2014the Fujian Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy 2020Y2012the Joint Funds for the National Clinical Key Specialty Construction Program 2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLocally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide, and its incidence is increasing year by year. Despite multimodal treatment, the recurrence rate of LARC patients remains high, about 20%-50%. However, the follow-up strategy according to tumor stage has certain limitations. There is no consensus on the optimal frequency and duration of follow-up. This study aims to comprehensively analyze the high-risk factors for recurrence in LARC from clinical characteristics, nutritional indicators, and imaging indexes. It intends to utilize conditional survival (CS) evaluation to assess dynamic survival and recurrence risks after comprehensive treatment of LARC and to develop individualized follow-up strategies.

methodsLogistic regression was utilized to analyze the independent recurrence factors in LARC patients. Calibration curve, decision curve, and ROC curve were employed to evaluate the model's efficacy. Kaplan-Meier curve was used to calculate CS rate and compare survival differences among different risk groups.

resultsA total of 561 patients were analyzed in our study. Our multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), extramural vascular invasion (EMVI), vascular tumor thrombus, perineural invasion, and tumor size were independent factors for recurrence. Subsequently, a nomogram model was constructed and risk stratification was performed. Calibration curves and decision curves demonstrated that the model exhibited good clinical efficacy. The area under the ROC curve for the model was 0.763, indicating good sensitivity and specificity. Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant differences in survival among different risk groups. Furthermore, we observed that the CS without local recurrence and distant metastasis increased each year, while the cumulative recurrence risk decreased annually with prolonged survival time. Tailored follow-up intensities were developed for different risk groups and clinical stages based on the cumulative recurrence risk.

conclusionThe personalized follow-up strategy based on risk stratification can optimize resource allocation, early detection of recurrence or metastasis, and ultimately enhance the overall care and prognosis of LARC patients.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalRectal NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNomogramsPrecision MedicinePrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsconditional survivaldynamic risk assessmenthigh‐risk recurrence factorsindividualized follow‐up strategieslocally advanced rectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID39467147
PMCPMC11516045

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.