Evidence mapPaperPMID 39467996Full record

SynthesisHigh blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension2025

Effect of nebivolol monotherapy or combination therapy on blood pressure levels in patients with hypertension: an updated systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis of 91 randomized controlled trials.

Athanasios Manolis, Paschalis Karakasis, Dimitrios Patoulias, Michalis Doumas, Manolis Kallistratos, Costas Thomopoulos, Maria Koutsaki, Guido Grassi, Giuseppe Mancia

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Efficacy and Safety of the Extemporaneous Combination Nebivolol/Amlodipine in Patients with Hypertension Uncontrolled on Monotherapy: The BOTTICELLI Study.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Athanasios Manolis2nd Department of Cardiology, Metropolitan Hospital, Piraeus, Greece.
Paschalis KarakasisSecond Department of Cardiology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital Hippokration, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Dimitrios PatouliasSecond Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Michalis DoumasSecond Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Manolis Kallistratos2nd Department of Cardiology, Metropolitan Hospital, Piraeus, Greece. kallistrat1972@gmail.com.
Costas ThomopoulosDepartment of Cardiology, LaikoHospital, Athens, Greece.
Maria KoutsakiCardiology Department, Asklepeion General Hospital, Voula, Greece.
Guido GrassiClinica Medica, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe ManciaESH Foundation/ESH Educational Board, University Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo systematically appraise and summarize the available evidence from published randomized controlled trials considering the effect of nebivolol on blood pressure in patients with hypertension.

methodsLiterature search was performed through Medline (via PubMed), Cochrane Library and Scopus until December 15, 2023. Double-independent study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were performed. Evidence was pooled with three-level mixed-effects meta-analysis.

resultsIn total, 7,737 participants with hypertension, who were treated with nebivolol, were analyzed across 91 RCTs. Nebivolol was associated with significantly greater reduction in office systolic and diastolic BP compared to placebo (MD = - 6.01 mmHg; 95% CI = [- 7.46, - 4.55] and MD = - 5.01 mmHg; 95% CI = [- 5.91, - 4.11], respectively). Moreover, resulted a similar reduction in systolic BP (MD = - 0.22 mmHg; 95% CI = [- 0.91, 0.46]) and a significantly greater reduction in diastolic BP compared to the active comparator (MD = - 0.71 mmHg; 95% CI = [- 1.27, - 0.16]). When considering the effect of nebivolol on 24-hour ambulatory BP, notable reductions were observed compared to placebo. In contrast, compared to the active comparators, there was no significant difference in systolic BP reduction, but a significant reduction in diastolic BP favoring nebivolol. Based on moderator analyses, the impact of nebivolol on the pooled estimates remained independent of the dose of nebivolol, age, male sex, trial duration, body mass index (BMI), baseline diabetes, heart failure, and baseline systolic and diastolic BP.

conclusionNebivolol, compared to placebo, showed a significant BP reduction and was non-inferior to other active comparators in terms of BP reduction.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor AgonistsAdrenergic beta-1 Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureHypertensionNebivololAdultAgedDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAdrenergic beta-1 Receptor AgonistsAdrenergic beta-1 Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsNebivololAmbulatory blood pressureArterial pressureHypertensionNebivololOffice blood pressure

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.