ArticleScientific reports2024
Brain tumor classification utilizing pixel distribution and spatial dependencies higher-order statistical measurements through explainable ML models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Hybrid Approach for Brain-Tumor Detection and Classification from MRI Images.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Interpretable multiclassification machine learning models in predicting the extent of small cell lung cancer metastasis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Early prediction of sepsis associated encephalopathy in elderly ICU patients using machine learning models: a retrospective study based on the MIMIC-IV database.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven approaches in pituitary neuroendocrine tumors: integrating endocrine-metabolic profiling for enhanced diagnostics and therapeutics.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain tumors are among the most fatal and devastating diseases, and they often result in a significant reduction in life expectancy. The devising of treatment plans that can extend the lives of affected individuals hinges on an accurate diagnosis of these tumors. Identifying and analyzing large volumes of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data manually proves to be both challenging and time-consuming. As a result, there exists a pressing need for a reliable machine-learning approach to accurately diagnose brain tumors, and numerous methods have already been proposed over the last decade. In this paper, a novel, comprehensive approach is proposed for identifying and classifying a given MR brain image as abnormal. Three common brain diseases, namely glioma, meningioma, and pituitary tumor, are chosen as abnormal brains, and the Figshare MRI brain image dataset was collected from the Kaggle and IEEE websites. The proposed method is initiated by employing 1st-order statistics, 2nd-order statistics, and higher-order transformed (DWT) feature extraction to extract features from images. Then missing data is addressed and handled using KNNImputer, followed by the application of the ExtratreesClassifier and PCA feature selection methods to identify the most relevant features and reduce the dimensions of these features. Subsequently, the reduced features are submitted to seven machine learning models, namely RF, GB, CB, SVM, LGBM, DT, and LR. The strategy of k-fold cross-validation is utilized to enhance the performance of those models. Finally, the models are evaluated using XAI approaches, which ensure transparent decision-making processes and provide insights into the model's predictions. Remarkably, our approach achieves the highest accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, MCC, Kappa, AUC-ROC, and R2, as well as the lowest loss, among the seven models evaluated, proving its effectiveness and applicability in multiple analytic applications relying on publicly available datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.