Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39468107›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Brain tumor classification utilizing pixel distribution and spatial dependencies higher-order statistical measurements through explainable ML models.

Sharmin Akter, Md Simul Hasan Talukder, Sohag Kumar Mondal, Mohammad Aljaidi, Rejwan Bin Sulaiman, Ahmad Abdullah Alshammari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sharmin AkterBiomedical Engineering, Jashore University of Science and Technology, Jashore, Bangladesh. sharmintalukder120@gmail.com.
Md Simul Hasan TalukderElectrical and Electronic Engineering, Dhaka University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh. simul@duet.ac.bd.
Sohag Kumar MondalElectrical and Electronic Engineering, Sohag Kumar Mondal, Khulna University of Engineering and Technology, Khulna, Bangladesh.
Mohammad AljaidiDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Information Technology, Zarqa University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Rejwan Bin SulaimanRejwan Bin Sulaiman, School of Computer science and Technology, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Ahmad Abdullah AlshammariDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, Northern Border University, Rafha, 91911, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tumors are among the most fatal and devastating diseases, and they often result in a significant reduction in life expectancy. The devising of treatment plans that can extend the lives of affected individuals hinges on an accurate diagnosis of these tumors. Identifying and analyzing large volumes of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data manually proves to be both challenging and time-consuming. As a result, there exists a pressing need for a reliable machine-learning approach to accurately diagnose brain tumors, and numerous methods have already been proposed over the last decade. In this paper, a novel, comprehensive approach is proposed for identifying and classifying a given MR brain image as abnormal. Three common brain diseases, namely glioma, meningioma, and pituitary tumor, are chosen as abnormal brains, and the Figshare MRI brain image dataset was collected from the Kaggle and IEEE websites. The proposed method is initiated by employing 1st-order statistics, 2nd-order statistics, and higher-order transformed (DWT) feature extraction to extract features from images. Then missing data is addressed and handled using KNNImputer, followed by the application of the ExtratreesClassifier and PCA feature selection methods to identify the most relevant features and reduce the dimensions of these features. Subsequently, the reduced features are submitted to seven machine learning models, namely RF, GB, CB, SVM, LGBM, DT, and LR. The strategy of k-fold cross-validation is utilized to enhance the performance of those models. Finally, the models are evaluated using XAI approaches, which ensure transparent decision-making processes and provide insights into the model's predictions. Remarkably, our approach achieves the highest accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, MCC, Kappa, AUC-ROC, and R2, as well as the lowest loss, among the seven models evaluated, proving its effectiveness and applicability in multiple analytic applications relying on publicly available datasets.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsBrainGliomaHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningMeningiomaCBDTDWTExtratreesClassifierGBKNNImputerLGBMLRMRIPCARFSVMXAI

Identifiers

PMID39468107
PMCPMC11519933

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.