Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39468301›Full record

ReviewEMBO molecular medicine2024

Diagnosing and engineering gut microbiomes.

Elisa Cappio Barazzone, Médéric Diard, Isabelle Hug, Louise Larsson, Emma Slack

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EMBO molecular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elisa Cappio Barazzone *Laboratory for Mucosal Immunology, Institute for Food, Nutrition and Health, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Médéric Diard *Basel Research Centre for Child Health, Basel, Switzerland.
Isabelle Hug *Basel Research Centre for Child Health, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4524-9569
Louise Larsson *Laboratory for Mucosal Immunology, Institute for Food, Nutrition and Health, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0000-2644-8223
Emma Slack *Laboratory for Mucosal Immunology, Institute for Food, Nutrition and Health, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland. emma.slack@hest.ethz.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-2473-1145

Funding

Basel Research Center for Child Health MIP: Microbiota Engineering for Child HealthSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (SNF) NCCR Microbiomes
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbes, nutrients and toxins that we are exposed to can have a profound effect on the composition and function of the gut microbiome. Thousands of peer-reviewed publications link microbiome composition and function to health from the moment of birth, right through to centenarians, generating a tantalizing glimpse of what might be possible if we could intervene rationally. Nevertheless, there remain relatively few real-world examples where successful microbiome engineering leads to beneficial health effects. Here we aim to provide a framework for the progress needed to turn gut microbiome engineering from a trial-and-error approach to a rational medical intervention. The workflow starts with truly understanding and accurately diagnosing the problems that we are trying to fix, before moving on to developing technologies that can achieve the desired changes.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsHumansBacteriophageGutMicrobiota EngineeringProbioticVaccination

Identifiers

PMID39468301
PMCPMC11554810

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.