Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39470189›Full record

ArticlemSystems2024

Gut and oral microbial compositional differences in women with breast cancer, women with ductal carcinoma

Emma McCune, Anukriti Sharma, Breanna Johnson, Tess O'Meara, Sarah Theiner, Maribel Campos, Diane Heditsian, Susie Brain, Jack A Gilbert, Laura Esserman and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The dialogue between breast cancer and microorganisms.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. BeyondMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Emma McCuneDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Anukriti SharmaDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Breanna JohnsonDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Tess O'MearaDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Sarah TheinerDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Maribel CamposDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Diane HeditsianDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Susie BrainDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Jack A GilbertDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.
Laura EssermanDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Michael J CampbellDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3788-9240

Funding

Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF)California Breast Cancer Research Program (CBCRP)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study characterized and compared the fecal and oral microbiota from women with early-stage breast cancer (BC), women with ductal carcinoma IMPORTANCE: Emerging evidence suggests that the gut microbiota may play a role in breast cancer. Few studies have evaluated both the gut and oral microbiomes in women with breast cancer (BC), and none have characterized these microbiomes in women with ductal carcinoma

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAdultAgedBacteriaCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingCase-Control StudiesFecesFemaleHumansMicrobiotaMiddle AgedMouthRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sbreast cancerDCISgut microbiotaoral microbiota

Identifiers

PMID39470189
PMCPMC11575313

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.