Evidence mapPaperPMID 39470809Full record

ArticleMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2024

[Hemodynamic monitoring- (NOT) a nursing task?!]

Carsten Hermes

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Carsten HermesHochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Hamburg (HAW Hamburg), Hamburg, Deutschland. carsten.hermes@haw-hamburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0889-1381

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring adequate and stable hemodynamic conditions is an essential component of patient care in emergency and intensive care units. The assessment of circulatory status is complex and influenced by patient-specific characteristics, medical staff experience, and available equipment. Hemodynamic monitoring encompasses both invasive and noninvasive methods to monitor circulatory parameters. It supports patient management and ensures therapeutic success by alerting healthcare providers to deviations, including critical values. In practice, numerical data often receive more emphasis than comprehensive patient observation, potentially leading to misinterpretation. Advanced practice nurses (APNs) are highly qualified nursing professionals who work largely autonomously due to their advanced training. However, there is currently no uniform legal regulation for these professions in Germany. Clear definitions and nationwide regulations for related academic programs are necessary. Interprofessional collaboration, as well as the qualifications and numbers of nursing staff, significantly impact therapeutic outcomes. Hemodynamics involves the physical principles of blood flow and the assessment of vital parameters to ensure organ perfusion and oxygenation. The competence and knowledge of nursing staff are crucial for safe patient care. Local standard operating procedures (SOPs) should consider interprofessional collaboration and the qualifications of team members.

Indexed as

Hemodynamic MonitoringAdvanced Practice NursingClinical CompetenceCooperative BehaviorCritical Care NursingGermanyHemodynamicsHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationIntersectoral CollaborationAdvanced practice nurseIntensive careInterprofessional collaborationNursing competenciesPatient monitoring

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.