ArticleThe British journal of radiology2025
Value of projectional imaging relative to cross-sectional imaging to assess catheter tip position in the superior vena cava: evaluation of reader variability.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rapid perfusion ultrasonography in the assessment of axillary venous catheter tip position: a prospective observational study.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe cavo-atrial junction (CAJ) is the most appropriate central venous catheters CVC tip location to reduce complications. Among chest X-ray (CXR) landmarks for tips assessment, only the pericardial reflection lies in the same plane as the vascular structures. We aimed to evaluate the observer variability to determine tip positioning on CXR, using CT as a gold standard.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 107 CT scans of patients with port catheters (January-December 2021). The tip to CAJ distance (DCAJ) was measured on both projectional (PJ) and cross-sectional (CS) CT images by 2 × 2 observers (within and between evaluations). Observational statistics included paired t-tests, repeatability coefficients (RC), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), with data visualized using Bland-Altman plots.
resultsAll ICC were >0.9, indicating excellent reliability. The mean difference between observers comparing CS and PJ was 0.13 ± 0.80 cm (P = .10) with outer 95% confidence limits of 1.92 cm and -2.17 cm and an RC of 1.79 cm.
conclusionCXR provides a reliable method for CVC tip localization, though assessment variability is ±2 cm. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: CXR assessment of CVC tips shows both intra- and inter-individual variability, due to challenges in identifying the CAJ and catheter tip . While considering the 3 cm anatomical zone around the CAJ acceptable, operators should be aware of the 2 cm variability resulting from CXR assessment. To account for this variability and avoid the risk of positioning the tip beyond 3 cm from the CAJ, operators should reduce the CXR-based acceptable zone to 1 cm around the CAJ, impacting approximately 30% of procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.