ArticleMultiple sclerosis and related disorders2024
Artificial neural network-based prediction of multiple sclerosis using blood-based metabolomics data.
Article in Multiple sclerosis and related disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oxidative-Stress-Associated Molecular Signatures in Immune-Mediated Diseases: A Systematic Review Integrating Machine Learning and Systems Biology Approaches.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Immune-responsive gene 1: The mitochondrial key to Th17 cell pathogenicity in CNS autoimmunity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Explainable Machine Learning in the Prediction of Depression.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Unveiling therapeutic targets and preventive components for kidney insufficiency and blood stasis-type BPH: bridging metabolomics, network pharmacology and reverse screening.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) remains a challenging neurological condition for diagnosis and management and is often detected in late stages, delaying treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a promising approach to extracting MS information when applied to different patient datasets. Given the critical role of metabolites in MS profiling, metabolomics data may be an ideal platform for the application of AI to predict disease. In the present study, a machine-learning (ML) approach was used for a detailed analysis of metabolite profiles and related pathways in patients with MS and healthy controls (HC). This approach identified unique alterations in biochemical metabolites and their correlation with disease severity parameters. To enhance the efficiency of using metabolic profiles to determine disease severity or the presence of MS, we trained an AI model on a large volume of blood-based metabolomics datasets. We constructed this model using an artificial neural network (ANN) architecture with perceptrons. Data were divided into training, validation, and testing sets to determine model accuracy. After training, accuracy reached 87 %, sensitivity was 82.5 %, specificity was 89 %, and precision was 77.3 %. Thus, the developed model seems highly robust, generalizable with a wide scope and can handle large amounts of data, which could potentially assist neurologists. However, a large multicenter cohort study is necessary for further validation of large-scale datasets to allow the integration of AI in clinical settings for accurate diagnosis and improved MS management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.