ReviewCell death discovery2024
Unraveling the landscape of m6A RNA methylation in wound healing and scars.
Review in Cell death discovery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Empowering Extracellular Vesicle Wound Therapy via Local Drug Delivery Systems: Mechanistic Insights and Advanced Stimuli-Responsive Strategies.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- ALKBH5 aggravates scarring after glaucoma surgery via mCell death and differentiation · 2026Article
- RNA modifications: molecular orchestrators of wound healing.Burns & trauma · 2026Article
- Crosstalk between gut microbiota and RNA N6-methyladenosine modification in diabetic retinopathy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- mFrontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Function of epigenetic modifications in wound healing and potential therapies (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Unlocking the potential: m6A-RNA methylation in severe epidermolysis bullosa simplex.Bioscience reports · 2025Article
- METTL3-Mediated mDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wound healing is a complex process involving sequential stages of hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. Multiple cell types and factors, including underlying conditions like diabetes and bacterial colonization, can influence healing outcomes and scar formation. N6-methyladenosine (m6A), a predominant RNA modification, plays crucial roles in gene expression regulation, impacting various biological processes and diseases. m6A regulates embryonic skin morphogenesis, wound repair, and pathophysiological processes like inflammation and angiogenesis. Recent studies have highlighted the role of m6A in wound healing, scar formation, and tissue remodeling. Additionally, m6A presents a unique expression pattern in pathological wounds and scars, potentially influencing wound healing and scar formation through modulating gene expression and cellular signaling, thereby serving as potential biomarkers or therapeutic targets. Targeting m6A modifications are potential strategies to enhance wound healing and reduce scar formation. This review aims to explore the roles and mechanisms of m6A RNA methylation in wound healing and scars, and discuss current challenges and perspectives. Continued research in this field will provide significant value for optimal wound repair and scar treatment.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.