ArticleScientific reports2024
Evaluation of tolvaptan-associated hepatic disorder using different national pharmacovigilance databases.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Real-World Pharmacovigilance Analysis of the Safety Profiles Associated with Anti-MRSA Agents Using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) Database.Infectious disease reports · 2026Article
- Safety assessment of tolvaptan: real-world adverse event analysis using the FAERS database.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tolvaptan-associated hepatic disorder is a rare, but lethal adverse event; however, the precise risk and time of onset remain unclear. This study aimed to characterize the severity, time‑to‑onset, and outcomes of hepatic disorder based on patient age and sex. Patient data were acquired from the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database (JADER) and the JAPIC AERS database, which consists of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) processed by the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center. Hepatic disorder was classified as severe or nonsevere. Tolvaptan use was associated with hepatic disorder in analyses using the FAERS [Severe hepatic disorder: reporting odds ratio (ROR) 4.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.33‒5.61; information component (IC) 2.11, 95% CI 1.92‒2.29; nonsevere hepatic disorder: ROR 6.78, 95% CI 6.01‒7.65; IC 2.51, 95% CI 2.33‒2.68] and the JADER (severe hepatic disorder: ROR 4.21, 95% CI 3.57‒4.97; IC 1.86, 95% CI 1.63‒2.10; nonsevere hepatic disorder: ROR 4.27, 95% CI 3.68‒4.95; IC 1.83, 95% CI 1.62‒2.04). A time‑to‑onset analysis revealed that the median onset time was significantly longer in patients aged < 60 years compared with patients aged ≥ 60, regardless of the severity (FAERS: severe hepatic disorder 7 vs. 58 days, p < 0.0001; nonsevere hepatic disorder 8 vs. 52.5 days, p < 0.0001; JADER: severe hepatic disorder 9.5 vs. 32 days, p = 0.0017; nonsevere hepatic disorder 9 vs. 89 days, p < 0.0001). Severe outcomes were observed, regardless of the severity of hepatic disorder. Patients should be monitored for liver function based on age to prevent fatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.