ArticleFrontiers in genetics2024
Prenatal diagnosis and postnatal follow-up of 15 fetuses with 16p13.11 microduplication syndrome.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spectrum of Copy Number Variants in Fetal Congenital Heart Disease and Their Clinical Implications: A Retrospective Study from a Tertiary Care Center.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- 16p13.11 deletion/duplication: a large cohort study on prenatal diagnosis, postnatal outcomes, and phenotypic manifestations.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- 16p13.11 microduplication in 14 fetuses: prenatal diagnosis and postnatal follow-up.Molecular cytogenetics · 2025Article
- Prenatal Diagnosis, Ultrasound Findings, and Follow-Up Evaluation of 16p13.11 Deletion and Duplication Syndromes: Preliminary Assessment of Fetal Genotype-Phenotype.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The clinical phenotypes of 16p13.11 microduplication syndrome have been extensively reported in previous studies, mostly about adults and children, with limited information available on fetal cases. This study aims to explore the genotype-phenotype correlation of fetuses with 16p13.11 microduplication syndrome and analyze the characteristics of prenatal diagnosis indications and provide clinical information for prenatal and postnatal genetic counseling. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 3,451 pregnant women who underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis for SNP array between January 2018 and December 2022 at the Jinan Maternal and Child Health Hospital. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed on the prenatal diagnosis indications, pedigree analysis, pregnancy outcomes and postnatal follow-up of 15 fetuses with 16p13.11 microduplication syndrome. Results: SNP array revealed that 15 fetuses had duplications in the 16p13.11 region with varying prenatal diagnosis indications. Among the cases, 6/15 exhibited ultrasound abnormalities, 5/15 had abnormal chromosomal copy number variations as indicated by non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), one case involved advanced maternal age, and 3/15 had other abnormalities. 16p13.11 microduplication syndrome was closely related to ultrasound abnormalities, especially structural abnormalities and soft marker anomalies (abnormal ultrasonic soft indicators), while the indication of NIPT could improve the detection rate of copy number variations (CNVs) in this region. Only 7/15 fetuses underwent pedigree verification, with one case of Conclusion: The prenatal phenotypes of fetuses with 16p13.11 microduplication were highly associated with ultrasound abnormalities but lacked specificity. Comprehensive genetic tracing, outcome analysis, and follow-up are essential for providing accurate prenatal and postnatal genetic counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.