ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2024
In-Hospital Risk Factors and Short-Term Outcomes for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Medical Complications After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Analysis of Trends in US Admissions from 2006 to 2022.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the relevant factors affecting the prognosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Methods: 284 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage who were hospitalized in our hospital from January 1, 2022 to June 30, 2024 were selected and divided into a good prognosis group and a poor prognosis group according to the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. The general clinical data of the patients were also collected, and the independent risk factors affecting the poor prognosis of the patients were screened by univariate logistic regression analysis. Results: Patients with a favorable prognosis had a lower incidence rate of rebleeding (4.72% vs 17.65%; Conclusion: Coinfection is a very important independent risk factor affecting prognosis, and clinical care should focus on how to reduce coinfection during hospitalization in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage and treat it aggressively to reduce mortality and disability and improve patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.