Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39473871›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nephrology2024

Quantifying measurement uncertainty in renal transplant biopsy assessment.

Xavier Loizeau, Marina Romanchikova, Spencer A Thomas, Moulham Alsuleman, John O O Ayorinde, Gavin J Pettigrew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xavier LoizeauData Science Department, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, United Kingdom.
Marina RomanchikovaData Science Department, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, United Kingdom.
Spencer A ThomasData Science Department, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, United Kingdom.
Moulham AlsulemanData Science Department, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, United Kingdom.
John O O AyorindeDepartment of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Gavin J PettigrewDepartment of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Renal transplant biopsies provide insights into graft health and support decision making. The current evidence on links between biopsy scores and transplant outcomes suggests there may be numerous factors affecting biopsy scores. Here we adopt measurement science approach to investigate the sources of uncertainty in biopsy assessment and suggest techniques to improve its robustness. Methods: Histological assessments, Remuzzi scores, biopsy processing and clinical variables are obtained from 144 repeat biopsies originating from 16 deceased-donor kidneys. We conducted sensitivity analysis to find the morphometric features with highest discriminating power and studied the dependencies of these features on biopsy and stain type. The analysis results formed a basis for recommendations on reducing the assessment variability. Results: Most morphometric variables are influenced by the biopsy and stain types. The variables with the highest discriminatory power are sclerotic glomeruli counts, healthy glomeruli counts per unit area, percentages of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy as well as diameter and lumen of the worst artery. A revised glomeruli adequacy score is proposed to improve the robustness of the glomeruli statistics, whereby a minimum of 104 µm Discussion: The findings are transferable to several biopsy scoring systems. We hope that this work will help practitioners to understand the sources of statistical uncertainty and improve the utility of renal biopsy.

Indexed as

glomerular adequacymeasurement uncertaintypre-transplantation biopsyRemuzzi scorereproducibilitysensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID39473871
PMCPMC11519413

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.