ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2024
Performance control during longitudinal activation fMRI studies.
Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The documentation of performance during functional imaging represents a standard procedure employed to control for compliance, sensorimotor, and cognitive demands. In the case of motor tasks, preciseness, force, and frequency have a significant impact on the magnitude of functional activation. Questionnaires are used in psychological investigations to control for cognitive demand, while psychophysiological documentation is employed to record bodily responses. For longitudinal intervention studies, it is of utmost importance to implement meticulous pre- and post-performance controls and balance to accurately assess changes over time. Any changes in compliance may introduce additional uncontrolled variables, which can hinder the interpretation of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-related changes. This narrative review presents strategies for controlling and balancing performance in functional imaging approaches to document neuroplasticity in rehabilitative studies. These strategies include not only motor-related aspects, such as precision, velocity, and force, but also timing aspects, such as the start and stop of movement periods. In addition, it discusses strategies for the modulation and control of movement aspects with visual feedback, as well as for the control of physiological changes during experimental modulation. Although these measures require additional care, which is often more demanding than the neuroimaging part of the study, they are crucial for a relevant interpretation and publication of fMRI studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.