Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39474131›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2024

Performance control during longitudinal activation fMRI studies.

Martin Lotze

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Martin LotzeFunctional Imaging Unit, Institute for Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medicine of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The documentation of performance during functional imaging represents a standard procedure employed to control for compliance, sensorimotor, and cognitive demands. In the case of motor tasks, preciseness, force, and frequency have a significant impact on the magnitude of functional activation. Questionnaires are used in psychological investigations to control for cognitive demand, while psychophysiological documentation is employed to record bodily responses. For longitudinal intervention studies, it is of utmost importance to implement meticulous pre- and post-performance controls and balance to accurately assess changes over time. Any changes in compliance may introduce additional uncontrolled variables, which can hinder the interpretation of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-related changes. This narrative review presents strategies for controlling and balancing performance in functional imaging approaches to document neuroplasticity in rehabilitative studies. These strategies include not only motor-related aspects, such as precision, velocity, and force, but also timing aspects, such as the start and stop of movement periods. In addition, it discusses strategies for the modulation and control of movement aspects with visual feedback, as well as for the control of physiological changes during experimental modulation. Although these measures require additional care, which is often more demanding than the neuroimaging part of the study, they are crucial for a relevant interpretation and publication of fMRI studies.

Indexed as

cognitiondata evaluationemotional processingfMRIperformance controlpsychophysiologysensorimotorsensory modality

Identifiers

PMID39474131
PMCPMC11521045

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.