Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39474283›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2024

Machine learning-based personalized composite score dissects risk and protective factors for cognitive and motor function in older participants.

Ann-Kathrin Schalkamp, Stefanie Lerche, Isabel Wurster, Benjamin Roeben, Milan Zimmermann, Franca Fries, Anna-Katharina von Thaler, Gerhard Eschweiler, Walter Maetzler, Daniela Berg and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ann-Kathrin Schalkamp *Department of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neuroscience, UK Dementia Research Institute, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Stefanie Lerche *Department of Neurodegeneration and Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Center of Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Isabel WursterDepartment of Neurodegeneration and Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Center of Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Benjamin RoebenDepartment of Neurodegeneration and Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Center of Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Milan ZimmermannDepartment of Neurodegeneration and Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Center of Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Franca FriesDepartment of Neurodegeneration and Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Center of Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Anna-Katharina von ThalerDepartment of Neurology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Gerhard EschweilerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Walter MaetzlerDepartment of Neurology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Daniela BergDepartment of Neurology, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Fabian H SinzInstitute for Computer Science, University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Kathrin BrockmannDepartment of Neurodegeneration and Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Center of Neurology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: With age, sensory, cognitive, and motor abilities decline, and the risk for neurodegenerative disorders increases. These impairments influence the quality of life and increase the need for care, thus putting a high burden on society, the economy, and the healthcare system. Therefore, it is important to identify factors that influence healthy aging, particularly ones that are potentially modifiable through lifestyle choices. However, large-scale studies investigating the influence of multi-modal factors on a global description of healthy aging measured by multiple clinical assessments are sparse. Methods: We propose a machine learning model that simultaneously predicts multiple cognitive and motor outcome measurements on a personalized level recorded from one learned composite score. This personalized composite score is derived from a large set of multi-modal components from the TREND cohort, including genetic, biofluid, clinical, demographic, and lifestyle factors. Results: We found that a model based on a single composite score was able to predict cognitive and motor abilities almost as well as a classical flexible regression model specifically trained for each single clinical score. In contrast to the flexible regression model, our composite score model is able to identify factors that globally influence cognitive and motoric abilities as measured by multiple clinical scores. The model identified several risk and protective factors for healthy aging and recovered physical exercise as a major, modifiable, protective factor. Discussion: We conclude that our low parametric modeling approach successfully recovered known risk and protective factors of healthy aging on a personalized level while providing an interpretable composite score. We suggest validating this modeling approach in other cohorts.

Indexed as

agingcognitionhealthymachine learningphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID39474283
PMCPMC11518739

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.