ReviewCureus2024
Revolutionizing Radiology With Artificial Intelligence.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI literacy in healthcare organisations: implementing article 4 of the EU AI Act with M-SHALF.npj health systems · 2026Review
- Article
- MRI Waiting Time Disparities in Saudi Public Hospitals: A Six-Year Retrospective Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- The role of artificial intelligence in early detection and risk prediction of ischemic heart disease.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Radiography-based AI decision support for further post-traumatic knee MRI referral in children.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Hidden Fragilities and the Path to Resilience.Saudi medical journal · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning-driven advancements in gastrointestinal cancer: Paving the way for precision medicine.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-assisted radiotherapy for pelvic and abdominal malignancies: assessing feasibility in the context of Africa-specific risks.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Construction and prototype effect evaluation of a multi-agent collaborative system for operating room nursing.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in radiology: 173 commercially available products and their scientific evidence.European radiology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Advancing Precision, Accuracy, and Early Detection in Cancer Diagnosis.Cureus · 2025Review
- AI-Powered Chest X-Ray for Diagnosing Pulmonary Tuberculosis in County and Township Health Care Facilities in Yichang: Retrospective, Real-World Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Review
- Factors influencing the choice of radiology as a specialty among clinical-year medical students in Nigeria: a multi-center cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery: A Comprehensive Review From Diagnosis to Rehabilitation.Cureus · 2025Review
- Large Language Model-Based Writing in Published Sports Medicine Research: Uncovering a Growing Influence.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in coronary artery calcification scoring: Current progress and future directions.Global cardiology science & practice · 2025Review
- Diagnostic, Therapeutic, and Prognostic Applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Clinical Management of Brain Metastases (BMs).Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Clinical obstacles to machine-learning POCUS adoption and system-wide AI implementation (The COMPASS-AI survey).The ultrasound journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming the field of radiology, offering significant advancements in diagnostic accuracy, workflow efficiency, and patient care. This article explores AI's impact on various subfields of radiology, emphasizing its potential to improve clinical practices and enhance patient outcomes. AI-driven technologies such as machine learning, deep learning, and natural language processing (NLP) are playing a pivotal role in automating routine tasks, aiding in early disease detection, and supporting clinical decision-making, allowing radiologists to focus on more complex diagnostic challenges. Key applications of AI in radiology include improving image analysis through computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems, which enhance the detection of abnormalities in imaging, such as tumors. AI tools have demonstrated high accuracy in analyzing medical images, integrating data from multiple imaging modalities such as CT, MRI, and PET to provide comprehensive diagnostic insights. These advancements facilitate personalized treatment planning and complement radiologists' workflows. However, for AI to be fully integrated into radiology workflows, several challenges must be addressed, including ensuring transparency in how AI algorithms work, protecting patient data, and avoiding biases that could affect diverse populations. Developing explainable AI systems that can clearly show how decisions are made is crucial, as is ensuring AI tools can seamlessly fit into existing radiology systems. Collaboration between radiologists, AI developers, and policymakers, alongside strong ethical guidelines and regulatory oversight, will be key to ensuring AI is implemented safely and effectively in clinical practice. Overall, AI holds tremendous promise in revolutionizing radiology. Through its ability to automate complex tasks, enhance diagnostic capabilities, and streamline workflows, AI has the potential to significantly improve the quality and efficiency of radiology practices. Continued research, development, and collaboration will be crucial in unlocking AI's full potential and addressing the challenges that accompany its adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.