Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39475062›Full record

ArticleAge and ageing2024

New horizons in systems engineering and thinking to improve health and social care for older people.

Navneet Aujla, Tricia Tooman, Stella Arakelyan, Tim Kerby, Louise Hartley, Amy O'Donnell, Bruce Guthrie, Ian Underwood, Julie A Jacko, Atul Anand

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Age and ageing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Navneet AujlaPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Tricia ToomanAdvanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Stella ArakelyanAdvanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0326-707X
Tim KerbyEdinburgh Systems Ltd, Edinburgh, UK.
Louise HartleyEdinburgh Systems Ltd, Edinburgh, UK.
Amy O'DonnellPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Bruce GuthrieEdinburgh Systems Ltd, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4191-4880
Ian UnderwoodAdvanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Julie A JackoThe Centre for Medical Informatics, The Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Atul AnandAdvanced Care Research Centre, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6428-4554

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing models for the safe, timely and effective delivery of health and social care are challenged by an ageing population. Services and care pathways are often optimised for single-disease management, while many older people are presenting with multiple long-term conditions and frailty. Systems engineering describes a holistic, interdisciplinary approach to change that is focused on people, system understanding, design and risk management. These principles are the basis of many established quality improvement (QI) tools in health and social care, but implementation has often been limited to single services or condition areas. Newer engineering techniques may help reshape more complex systems. Systems thinking is an essential component of this mindset to understand the underlying relationships and characteristics of a working system. It promotes the use of tools that map, measure and interrogate the dynamics of complex systems. In this New Horizons piece, we describe the evolution of systems approaches while noting the challenges of small-scale QI efforts that fail to address whole-system problems. The opportunities for novel soft-systems approaches are described, along with a recent update to the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model, which includes human-centred design. Systems modelling and simulation techniques harness routine data to understand the functioning of complex health and social care systems. These tools could support better-informed system change by allowing comparison of simulated approaches before implementation, but better effectiveness evidence is required. Modern systems engineering and systems thinking techniques have potential to inform the redesign of services appropriate for the complex needs of older people.

Indexed as

Health Services for the AgedQuality ImprovementSystems AnalysisAgedAgingDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedHumansmultimorbidityolder peoplesystems engineeringsystems thinking

Identifiers

PMID39475062
PMCPMC11522864

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.