SynthesisBreast cancer research and treatment2025
Continental differences in the association between excess body weight and prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe association between obesity and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) prognosis has been equivocal, with considerable heterogeneity between and within studies. Recent meta-analyses report adverse associations with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in TNBC. We update this evidence and examine study- and disease-specific sources of heterogeneity.
methodsA systematic search of four databases was conducted until February 22, 2023. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to pool hazard ratios (HR) for OS, DFS, and breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM). Subgroup analyses examined sources of study heterogeneity.
resultsIn meta-analyses of included studies (n = 33), significant associations were observed between excess body weight and worse OS (n = 24; HR = 1.20; 95%CI 1.20-1.34), DFS (n = 26; HR = 1.15; 1.05-1.27), and BCSM (n = 9; HR = 1.13; 1.00-1.27). In subgroup meta-analyses, significant inter-study survival differences were observed for study location (OS, DFS), time period of diagnoses (DFS), menopausal status (OS), and body mass index cut points examined (OS). Asian and European studies reported significant associations with OS (HR = 1.31; 1.11-1.54 and HR = 1.38; 1.00-1.89, respectively) and DFS (HR = 1.28; 1.07-1.54 and HR = 1.44; 1.13-1.84, respectively); however, no association was observed between obesity and TNBC prognosis in North American studies (OS: HR = 1.03; 0.89-1.19; DFS: HR = 1.05; 0.95-1.15). Location subgroup differences remained robust after excluding poor-quality studies. Post hoc analysis in the subset of studies reporting predominantly (≥ 70%) White sample showed no statistically significant associations for OS (HR = 1.13; 95%CI 0.96, 1.34), DFS (HR = 1.03; 95%CI 0.86, 1.23), or BCSM (HR = 1.08; 95%CI 0.91, 1.27).
conclusionThis study further confirms that obesity is associated with poor prognosis in TNBC and identified subgroups at higher risk. Ethnic differences in the association between excess body weight and TNBC are reported. Further exploration of study and patient characteristics is needed to properly understand the populations most at risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39476311What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.