ArticleBMJ open2024
Effectiveness and acceptability of different lifestyle interventions for women with polycystic ovary syndrome: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWomen with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) experience various metabolic, endocrine, reproductive and psychosocial manifestations. Lifestyle modification is crucial for the management of PCOS to reduce long-term complications. Nonetheless, the efficacy and acceptability of lifestyle interventions differs, and there are no uniform methods of clinical application. Hence, a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) are needed to explore the efficacy and acceptability of lifestyle interventions to inform clinical practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Ten databases (Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Specialised Register, Cochrane Register of Studies Online, PubMed, EMBASE (Excerpta Medica Database), PsycINFO, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang, VIP, and Sinomed) and four clinical trial registry platforms will be searched to identify literature published in English or Chinese reporting results of randomised clinical trials conducted to evaluate the effects of lifestyle interventions for women with PCOS. The reference lists of the included studies will be manually searched. Primary outcomes will include biochemical and clinical hyperandrogenism, recruitment and retention rates. Secondary outcomes will encompass menstrual regularity, ovulation, anthropometry and quality of life. Literature selection and extraction of data will be performed independently by at least two researchers. An NMA random-effects model will be implemented for amalgamating evidence. All treatments will be ranked based on the value of p. OpenBUGS will be used for Bayesian modelling, with output verifications generated in Stata and R. The quality of evidence supporting network estimates of major outcomes will also be appraised using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this review as no data will be collected from human participants. Results will be presented in a peer-reviewed publication. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024499819.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.