Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39477352›Full record

SynthesisEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2024

Multicomponent services for symptoms in serious respiratory illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anna Spathis, Charles C Reilly, Claudia Bausewein, Lynn F Reinke, Lorena Romero, Natasha E Smallwood, Magnus Ekström, Anne E Holland

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evidence-based management of symptoms in serious respiratory illness: what is in our toolbox?European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna SpathisDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK aos10@cam.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9837-7281
Charles C ReillyDepartment of Physiotherapy, King's College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2520-2859
Claudia BauseweinDepartment of Palliative Medicine, LMU University Hospital Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0958-3041
Lynn F ReinkeCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3173-9513
Lorena RomeroThe Ian Potter Library, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9884-5463
Natasha E SmallwoodDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3403-3586
Magnus EkströmRespiratory Medicine, Allergology and Palliative Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7227-5113
Anne E HollandDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2061-845X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople living with serious respiratory illness experience a high burden of symptoms. This review aimed to determine whether multicomponent services reduce symptoms in people with serious illness related to respiratory disease.

methodsElectronic databases were searched to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating multicomponent services that enrolled patients due to symptoms, rather than underlying disease, and provided at least one nonpharmacological intervention. The primary outcome was chronic breathlessness and secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life (HRQoL), cough, fatigue and adverse events. At least two authors independently screened studies, assessed risk of bias and extracted data.

resultsFive RCTs, involving 439 patients, were included. In comparison to usual care, multicomponent services improved breathlessness mastery (Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) mastery scale, mean difference (MD) 0.43 points, 95% CI 0.20-0.67, three RCTs, 327 participants) and HRQoL (CRQ total score, MD 0.24 points, 95% CI 0.04-0.40, two RCTs, 237 participants). Fatigue did not improve with multicomponent services and no studies evaluated cough. No serious adverse events were reported. The one study evaluating mortality found increased survival in those accessing a multicomponent service. The certainty of evidence was very low, mainly due to detection and reporting bias.

conclusionMulticomponent services improve breathlessness mastery and HRQoL, with minimal risk. These findings support the use of multicomponent symptom-directed services for people living with serious respiratory illness.

Indexed as

CoughDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedDyspneaFatigueHumansLungQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID39477352
PMCPMC11522971

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.