Observational studyScientific reports2024
Assessment of disability and disease burden in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders in the CIRCLES Cohort.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- C-Reactive Protein and Neurological Autoimmune Diseases: Bridging the Diagnostic and Pathogenic Gap.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Environmental risk factors of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a systematic review.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Review
- Satralizumab treatment in adults with aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G-seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in clinical practice.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinicalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) comprise autoimmune diseases imposing substantial disability. We compared an NMOSD-targeted disability assessment of mobility, vision, and self-care domains (individually and composite) with the multiple sclerosis-targeted Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) to assess NMOSD disease burden. An overall cohort (n = 505) and a subset of these patients with an enriched dataset (n = 198) were analyzed from the CIRCLES longitudinal, observational database of patients with AQP4-IgG-seropositive or -seronegative NMOSD in North America. Multinomial modeling was used to identify temporal correlates of disability improvement, stability, and worsening. Prior on-study relapse correlated with worsening mobility (OR, 3.08; 95% CI: 1.61-5.90), vision (OR, 3.99; 95% CI: 2.03-7.86), self-care disability (OR, 1.90; 95% CI: 1.07-3.38), and mean composite index disability (OR, 4.20; 95% CI: 1.71-10.34). Higher vision disability was associated with Black race, shorter time on-study, and AQP4-IgG-seropositive status in patients ≥ 18 years (p < 0.05). Disease onset phenotype and sex correlated with pain interference (p < 0.05). These correlates of NMOSD disability were undetected by EDSS. The CIRCLES real-world experience supports the need for NMOSD-specific disability assessment to improve recognition of disease burden, facilitate proactive clinical management, offer insights into resilience, and inform clinical trial design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.