Evidence mapPaperPMID 39478020Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Accounting for genetic effect heterogeneity in fine-mapping and improving power to detect gene-environment interactions with SharePro.

Wenmin Zhang, Robert Sladek, Yue Li, Hamed Najafabadi, Josée Dupuis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wenmin ZhangQuantitative Life Sciences Program, McGill University, Montréal, Canada. wenmin.zhang@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-4472-8859
Robert SladekQuantitative Life Sciences Program, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
Yue LiQuantitative Life Sciences Program, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3844-4865
Hamed NajafabadiQuantitative Life Sciences Program, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2735-4231
Josée DupuisQuantitative Life Sciences Program, McGill University, Montréal, Canada. josee.dupuis3@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-2871-3603

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classical gene-by-environment interaction (GxE) analysis can be used to characterize genetic effect heterogeneity but has a high multiple testing burden in the context of genome-wide association studies (GWAS). We adapt a colocalization method, SharePro, to account for effect heterogeneity in fine-mapping and identify candidates for GxE analysis with reduced multiple testing burden. SharePro demonstrates improved power for both fine-mapping and GxE analysis compared to existing methods as well as well-controlled false type I error in simulations. Using smoking status stratified GWAS summary statistics, we identify genetic effects on lung function modulated by smoking status that are not identified by existing methods. Additionally, using sex stratified GWAS summary statistics, we characterize sex differentiated genetic effects on fat distribution. In summary, we have developed an analytical framework to account for effect heterogeneity in fine-mapping and subsequently improve power for GxE analysis. The SharePro software for GxE analysis is openly available at https://github.com/zhwm/SharePro_gxe .

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionGenome-Wide Association StudySoftwareChromosome MappingComputer SimulationFemaleGenetic HeterogeneityGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMalePolymorphism, Single NucleotideSmoking

Identifiers

PMID39478020
PMCPMC11526169

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.