ReviewArteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology2024
Whys and Wherefores of Coronary Arterial Positive Remodeling.
Review in Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between coronary monosodium urate deposits at DECT and high-risk coronary plaque phenotypes and other features in gout patients.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- AI-Quantitative CT Coronary Plaque Features Associate With a Higher Relative Risk in Women: CONFIRM2 Registry.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2025Observational
- Relationship Between Carotid Artery Remodeling Characteristics and Early Carotid Atherosclerosis: An Ultrasonographic Multicenter Study.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025Article
- Napkin-ring sign plaques are associated with cerebral small vessel disease.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) in the Diagnostic Triage of Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation: A Long-term Outcome Study.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Positive remodeling (PR) is an atherosclerotic plaque feature defined as an increase in arterial caliber at the level of an atheroma, in response to increasing plaque burden. The mechanisms that lead to its formation are incompletely understood, but its role in coronary atherosclerosis has major clinical implications. Indeed, plaques with PR have elevated risk of provoking acute cardiac events. Hence, PR figures among the high-risk plaque features that cardiac imaging studies should report. This review aims to provide an overview of the current literature on coronary PR. It outlines the pathophysiology of PR, the different techniques used to assess its presence, and the imaging findings associated to PR, on both noninvasive and invasive studies. This review also summarizes clinical observations, trials, and studies, focused on the impact of PR on clinical outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.